International Bon Vivant and Raconteur ([info]nick_kaufmann) wrote,
@ 2008-09-03 00:01:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:politics

Bush/Thompson/Lieberman at the Republican National Convention
Bush, Thompson and Lieberman - it sounds like a law firm, doesn't it? Anyway, having watched all three speeches tonight without compulsively scratching the skin off my bones, I've come to the conclusion that I'm probably a lifelong Democrat, or at least an Independent, should New York allow Independents to vote in primaries someday. A lot of Republican rhetoric just rubs me the wrong way. A lot of it sounds militaristic to me.

In tonight's triumvirate of speechifying, Daddy Warbucks President Bush went first, appearing via satellite in what looked to me like a pre-recorded speech (not that it matters, but I thought it would be live, and for all I know it was). That speech went pretty much how you think it would: 9/11, McCain war hero, 9/11, McCain POW, the surge is working, 9/11, abortion is bad, McCain will be a strong daddy I mean president. It seemed to go over well with the delegates, who I think were all drunk. His speech lasted ten minutes, and then he had to go back to the serious business of hiding in a house you and I pay the mortgage on.

Next up was D.A. Arthur Branch Fred Thompson, and color me surprised because his speech was actually the best one of the night. Not that it was firecrackers, but he held my attention, which he's never done before. He spent several minutes detailing the horrors John McCain went through as a POW in North Vietnam, and it was extremely effective. And moving. It served as a reminder that McCain isn't a hero because he got shot down and captured, but because of what he endured afterward for five and a half years. Then Thompson lost me by launching into some rhetoric about how McCain and Palin are so great because they're "rebels" and "reformers" and aren't afraid to "take on the establishment" -- which is funny because there's no one in the universe anymore who doesn't view the Republicans as the party of the establishment. But he was the best speaker of the night, in my opinion, and that's saying something about how low energy the night felt.

Speaking of low energy, the third and final speaker was Droopy Dog Joe Lieberman. The delegates seemed restless at first, not sure how to feel about this man who was the vice presidential nominee of the other party eight years ago, where he was one half of a ticket most of these very same delegates called "Sore Loserman." Lieberman's speech did what it was supposed to do, which is give Democrats and Independents who think they might like McCain better than Obama permission to vote for him in November. If Thompson's speech was the most rousing, Lieberman's was the most strategic. Too bad he has no charisma.

Tomorrow night, Gov. Sarah Palin accepts her nomination for vice president! I can't wait to hear the words "hockey mom," "Hillary Clinton" and "glass ceiling" again!

(Okay, so obviously I'm being a little partisan here, but really, I tend not to like the Republicans. Remember, they're the party who wanted to tell committed, adult couples what they could and could not in their own bedrooms.)




(Post a new comment)


[info]txtriffidranch
2008-09-03 04:31 am UTC (link)
Well, if you had to see a Democrat go turncoat solely because he's craving a good jackboot-stomping attention, at least it's Joe Lieberman. Trust the GOP to allow the guy who actually managed to make Dick Cheney likeable in the 2000 VP debates to speak on their behalf.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 01:20 pm UTC (link)
The weird thing is that there's nothing in it for Lieberman to do this. Rumor has it McCain wanted to make him VP and the Republican base shot the idea down. So what's in it for Lieberman? Well, maybe a cabinet post down the road, but he could have had that by supporting the Dems too. Really, it seems like he's just BFF with McCain.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]admnaismith
2008-09-03 03:01 pm UTC (link)

Plus he gets to lose his committee chair in 2009, once the Democrats have some reinforcement Senators and don't have to grovel to Traitor Joe to preserve their 51/100 majority. They may boot him from the caucus altogether.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]txtriffidranch
2008-09-03 04:34 pm UTC (link)
I'd have said that as well had we not seen Lieberman do the same thing with Bush. I honestly think that Lieberman's alternating between his tropism for television cameras (he's already more pushy about TV time than Phil Gramm, and that's saying something, and that's without saying anything about his attempts at running for President) and getting even for his constituents daring to vote against him in the Democratic primary. He won't switch parties, both because of the GOP's recent tastes in leather boots and white robes and because he knows that the Democrats will continue to kiss up to him in the hopes that he'll vote their way from time to time, but he'll keep committing political suicide until his masters at ITT Hartford decide that he's too much of a liability. I'll tell you this: if he gets forced out, especially by recall vote, I figure that he maybe has six months before he blows his brains out from an inability to accept that nobody really likes or trusts him.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 06:35 pm UTC (link)
If he gets forced out, he'll run for another seat, or maybe governor, as a Republican.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]txtriffidranch
2008-09-03 07:10 pm UTC (link)
Good luck. He can run, but he'll probably get his ass kicked up around his shoulder blades, by both parties. In another couple of years, and I'm hearing this already, "Lieberman" is going into the dictionary right next to "Uncle Tom" and "Tio Taco".

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]glamberson
2008-09-03 05:04 am UTC (link)
I think I shall never allow you to mock me for perusing Shocklines again.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 01:22 pm UTC (link)
Ha! Well, it's true they're both reactionary circlejerks, but one is a circlejerk that could be of national importance, and the other is mainly a circlejerk about poorly written horror novels based on half-remembered movies. I'll stick with the Republican National Convention.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]stephen_dedman
2008-09-03 10:21 am UTC (link)
Did you notice that McCain's Hanoi Hilton cell-mate, who also spoke at the conference, was named Orson Swindle? I had to giggle at that. Sounds like the perfect replacement for Karl Rove.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 01:22 pm UTC (link)
I love that name. It's so Dickensian.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]stephen_dedman
2008-09-03 01:38 pm UTC (link)
I also had to chuckle at the name of the band entertaining at one of the parties at the convention: Hookers and Blow.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 01:39 pm UTC (link)
That's got to be somewhat embarrassing for everyone -- even the band!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]stephen_dedman
2008-09-03 01:54 pm UTC (link)
Especially after Dubya didn't show up :-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]txtriffidranch
2008-09-03 04:38 pm UTC (link)
Why should he, when he can score all the booger sugar he needs from his kids? (Seriously, did you note when Shrub was so debilitated at the Beijing Olympics that the Secret Service had to scoop him out of his chair and carry him off? Either he was on stuff that would have scared the crap out of Hunter S. Thompson, or he crapped his pants. Again.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]txtriffidranch
2008-09-03 04:35 pm UTC (link)
Naaah. That just means that they're sure to be booked for the opening of the George W. Presidential Library at SMU. Without hookers and blow, SMU wouldn't be the place it is today.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bev_vincent
2008-09-03 10:31 am UTC (link)
Tomorrow night, Gov. Sarah Palin accepts her nomination for vice president! I can't wait to hear the words "hockey mom," "Hillary Clinton" and "glass ceiling" again!

I especially want to hear her say "cracks." Her voice goes up into such a pitch that all the dogs in the neighborhood start howling.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 01:24 pm UTC (link)
Well, to be fair, we can't all control how our voices sound. But yes, add "eighteen million cracks" to the list of words that will be repeated tonight in a transparent attempt to lure disgruntled female Hillary supporters to their side.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bev_vincent
2008-09-03 06:27 pm UTC (link)
I'm not above taking cheap shots. CNN played that clip so many times that I wanted to commit hare kari.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]txtriffidranch
2008-09-03 04:36 pm UTC (link)
And does anyone remember how we all gave Admiral Stockdale, Ross Perot's running mate in 1992, such grief for the way he'd amp up "grrrrriiiiiIIIIIDLOCK!"?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 06:36 pm UTC (link)
Yup. Also, "Who am I? What am I doing here?" and "Sorry, my hearing aid turned off."

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]michaeljasper
2008-09-03 02:23 pm UTC (link)
Dude, thanks for taking one for the team and watching those speeches so we didn't have to do it! You da man.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 02:24 pm UTC (link)
I'll be doing it again tonight, too. It's a full schedule: Romney, Huckabee and Palin. Pray for me!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]michaeljasper
2008-09-03 02:40 pm UTC (link)
Wow. You are so going to heaven for this.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]admnaismith
2008-09-03 02:59 pm UTC (link)

Fred Thompson? I thought that was Edward Arnold! I was so surprised to see him still alive...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-09-03 03:07 pm UTC (link)
I thought it was Walter Matthau!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…